|
The American
Society for Bariatric Surgery describes three basic approaches
that weight loss surgery takes to achieve results:
- Restrictive
procedures that make the stomach smaller to limit food intake:
- Malabsorptive
procedures that alter digestion, thus causing the food to
be poorly digested and incompletely absorbed so that it
is eliminated in the stool:
- Combined
restrictive and malabsorptive procedures
Gastric
Restrictive Procedures
Vertical
Banded Gastroplasty
Vertical
Banded Gastroplasty (VBG) is a purely restrictive
procedure. In this procedure the upper stomach near the esophagus
is stapled vertically for about 2-1/2 inches (6 cm) to create
a smaller stomach pouch. The outlet from the pouch is restricted
by a band or ring that slows the emptying of the food and
thus creates the feeling of fullness.
Advantages
-
The primary advantage of this restrictive procedure is that
a reduced amount of well-chewed food enters and passes through
the digestive tract in the usual order. That allows the
nutrients and vitamins (as well as the calories) to be fully
absorbed into the body.
- After
10 years, studies show that patients can maintain 50% of
targeted excess weight loss.
Risks
- Postoperatively,
stapling of the stomach carries with it the risk of staple-line
disruption that can result in leakage and/or serious infection.
This may require prolonged hospitalization with antibiotic
treatment and/or additional operations.
-
Staple-line disruption may also, in the long-term, lead
to weight gain. For these reasons, some surgeons divide
the staple-line wall of the pouch from the rest of the stomach
to reduce the risk of long-term staple-line disruption.
-
The band or ring applied may lead to complications of obstruction
or perforation, requiring surgical intervention.
- Characteristically,
these procedures, while creating a sense of fullness, do
not provide the necessary feeling of satisfaction that one
has had "enough" to eat.
-
Because restrictive procedures rely solely on a small stomach
pouch to reduce food intake, there is the risk of the pouch
stretching or of the restricting band or ring at the pouch
outlet breaking or migrating, thus allowing patients to
eat too much.
- Around
40% of patients undergoing these procedures have lost less
than half their excess body weight.
- As
is the case with all weight loss surgeries, readmission
to a hospital may be required for fluid replacement or nutritional
support if there is excessive vomiting and adequate food
intake cannot be maintained.
Laparoscopic
Adjustable Gastric Banding
 A
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band
procedure is a purely restrictive surgical procedure in which
a band is placed around the upper most part of the stomach.
This band divides the stomach into two portions, one small
and one larger portion. Because food is regulated, most patients
feel full faster. Food digestion occurs through the normal
digestive process.
Click
here to download a patient brochure concerning the Lap-Band®
procedure.
You will need Adobe
Acrobat Reader to view this file.
| Lap-Band
Video Animations
|
Advantages
- Restricts
the amount of food that can be consumed at a meal
- Food
consumed passes through the digestive tract in the usual
order allowing it to be fully absorbed into the body
- In
multiple studies involving over 3000 patients, excess weight
loss ranged from 28-87%, with a minimum of 2 year postoperative
follow-up
- Band
can be adjusted to increase or decrease restriction
- Surgery
can be reversed
Risks
-
Gastric perforation or tearing in the stomach wall may require
additional operation
- Access
port leakage or twisting may require additional operation
- May
not provide the necessary feeling of satisfaction that one
has had enough to eat
- Nausea
and vomiting
- Outlet
obstruction
- Pouch
dilatation
- Band
migration/slippage
back
to top
Malabsorptive
Procedures
While
these operations also reduce the size of the stomach, the
stomach pouch created is much larger than with other procedures.
The goal is to restrict the amount of food consumed and alter
the normal digestive process, but to a much greater degree.
The anatomy of the small intestine is changed to divert the
bile and pancreatic juices so they meet the ingested food
closer to the middle or the end of the small intestine. With
the three approaches discussed below, absorption of nutrients
and calories is also reduced, but to a much greater degree
than with previously discussed procedures. Each of the three
differs in how and when the digestive juices (i.e., bile)
come into contact with the food.
Since
food bypasses the duodenum, all the risk considerations discussed
in the gastric bypass section regarding the malabsorption
of some minerals and vitamins also apply to these techniques,
only to a greater degree.
Biliopancreatic
Diversion (BPD)
BPD
removes approximately 3/4 of the stomach to produce both restriction
of food intake and reduction of acid output. Leaving enough
upper stomach is important to maintain proper nutrition. The
small intestine is then divided with one end attached to the
stomach pouch to create what is called an "alimentary
limb." All the food moves through this segment, however,
not much is absorbed. The bile and pancreatic juices move
through the "biliopancreatic limb," which is connected
to the side of the intestine close to the end. This supplies
digestive juices in the section of the intestine now called
the "common limb." The surgeon is able to vary the
length of the common limb to regulate the amount of absorption
of protein, fat and fat-soluble vitamins.
Distal
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (DRYGB)
RYGBP-E is an alternative means
of achieving malabsorption by creating a stapled or divided
small gastric pouch, leaving the remainder of stomach in place.
A long limb of the small intestine is attached to the stomach
to divert the bile and pancreatic juices. This procedure carries
with it fewer operative risks by avoiding removal of the lower
3/4 of the stomach. Gastric pouch size and the length of the
bypassed intestine determine the risks for ulcers, malnutrition
and other effects.
Biliopancreatic
Diversion with "Duodenal Switch” (DS)
This procedure is a variation of BPD
in which stomach removal is restricted to the outer margin,
leaving a sleeve of stomach with the pylorus and the beginning
of the duodenum at its end. The duodenum, the first portion
of the small intestine, is divided so that pancreatic and
bile drainage is bypassed. The near end of the "alimentary
limb" is then attached to the beginning of the duodenum,
while the "common limb" is created in the same way
as described above.
Advantages
- These
operations often result in a high degree of patient satisfaction
because patients are able to eat larger meals than with
a purely restrictive or standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
procedure.
- These
procedures can produce the greatest excess weight loss because
they provide the highest levels of malabsorption.
- In
one study of 125 patients, excess weight loss of 74% at
one year, 78% at two years, 81% at three years, 84% at four
years, and 91% at five years was achieved.
- Long-term
maintenance of excess body weight loss can be successful
if the patient adapts and adheres to a straightforward dietary,
supplement, exercise and behavioral regimen.
Risks
- For
all malabsorption procedures there is a period of intestinal
adaptation when bowel movements can be very liquid and frequent.
This condition may lessen over time, but may be a permanent
lifelong occurrence.
- Abdominal
bloating and malodorous stool or gas may occur.
- Close
lifelong monitoring for protein malnutrition, anemia and
bone disease is recommended. As well, lifelong vitamin supplementing
is required. It has been generally observed that if eating
and vitamin supplement instructions are not rigorously followed,
at least 25% of patients will develop problems that require
treatment.
- Changes
to the intestinal structure can result in the increased
risk of gallstone formation and the need for removal of
the gallbladder.
- Re-routing
of bile, pancreatic and other digestive juices beyond the
stomach can cause intestinal irritation and ulcers.
back
to top Combined
Restrictive & Malabsorptive Procedure
Roux-en-Y
Gastric Bypass
In recent
years, better clinical understanding of procedures combining
restrictive and malabsorptive approaches has increased the
choices of effective weight loss surgery for thousands of
patients. By adding malabsorption, food is delayed in mixing
with bile and pancreatic juices that aid in the absorption
of nutrients. The result is an early sense of fullness, combined
with a sense of satisfaction that reduces the desire to eat.
According to the American Society for Bariatric Surgery and
the National Institutes of Health, Roux-en-Y gastric
bypass is the current gold standard procedure
for weight loss surgery. It is one of the most frequently
performed weight loss procedures in the United States. In
this procedure, stapling creates a small (15 to 20cc) stomach
pouch. The remainder of the stomach is not removed, but is
completely stapled shut and divided from the stomach pouch.
The outlet from this newly formed pouch empties directly into
the lower portion of the jejunum, thus bypassing calorie absorption.
This is done by dividing the small intestine just beyond the
duodenum for the purpose of bringing it up and constructing
a connection with the newly formed stomach pouch. The other
end is connected into the side of the Roux limb of the intestine
creating the "Y" shape that gives the technique
its name. The length of either segment of the intestine can
be increased to produce lower or higher levels of malabsorption.
Advantages
- The
average excess weight loss after the Roux-en-Y procedure
is generally higher in a compliant patient than with purely
restrictive procedures.
-
One year after surgery, weight loss can average 77% of excess
body weight.
-
Studies show that after 10 to 14 years, 50-60% of excess
body weight loss has been maintained by some patients.
- A
2000 study of 500 patients showed that 96% of certain associated
health conditions studied (back pain, sleep apnea, high
blood pressure, diabetes and depression) were improved or
resolved.
Risks
- Because
the duodenum is bypassed, poor absorption of iron and calcium
can result in the lowering of total body iron and a predisposition
to iron deficiency anemia. This is a particular concern
for patients who experience chronic blood loss during excessive
menstrual flow or bleeding hemorrhoids. Women, already at
risk for osteoporosis that can occur after menopause, should
be aware of the potential for heightened bone calcium loss.
- Bypassing
the duodenum has caused metabolic bone disease in some patients,
resulting in bone pain, loss of height, humped back and
fractures of the ribs and hip bones. All of the deficiencies
mentioned above, however, can be managed through proper
diet and vitamin supplements.
- A
chronic anemia due to Vitamin B12 deficiency may occur.
The problem can usually be managed with Vitamin B12 pills
or injections.
- A
condition known as "dumping syndrome " can occur
as the result of rapid emptying of stomach contents into
the small intestine. This is sometimes triggered when too
much sugar or large amounts of food are consumed. While
generally not considered to be a serious risk to your health,
the results can be extremely unpleasant and can include
nausea, weakness, sweating, faintness and, on occasion,
diarrhea after eating. Some patients are unable to eat any
form of sweets after surgery.
- In
some cases, the effectiveness of the procedure may be reduced
if the stomach pouch is stretched and/or if it is initially
left larger than 15-30cc.
-
The bypassed portion of the stomach, duodenum and segments
of the small intestine cannot be easily visualized using
X-ray or endoscopy if problems such as ulcers, bleeding
or malignancy should occur.
back
to top
Laparoscopic
or Minimally Invasive Surgery
For the
last decade, laparoscopic procedures have been used in a variety
of general surgeries. Many people mistakenly believe that
these techniques are still "experimental." In fact,
laparoscopy has become the predominant technique in some areas
of surgery and has been used for weight loss surgery for several
years. Although few bariatric surgeons perform laparoscopic
weight loss surgeries, more are offering patients this less
invasive surgical option whenever possible.
When a laparoscopic operation is performed, a small video
camera is inserted into the abdomen. The surgeon views the
procedure on a separate video monitor. Most laparoscopic surgeons
believe this gives them better visualization and access to
key anatomical structures.
 The
camera and surgical instruments are inserted through small
incisions made in the abdominal wall. This approach is considered
less invasive because it replaces the need for one long incision
to open the abdomen. A recent study shows that patients having
had laparoscopic weight loss surgery experience less pain
after surgery resulting in easier breathing and lung function
and higher overall oxygen levels. Other realized benefits
with laparoscopy have been fewer wound complications such
as infection or hernia, and patients returning more quickly
to pre-surgical levels of activity.
Laparoscopic
procedures for weight loss surgery employ the same principles
as their "open" counterparts and produce similar
excess weight loss. Not all patients are candidates for this
approach, just as all bariatric surgeons are not trained in
the advanced techniques required to perform this less invasive
method. The American Society for Bariatric Surgery recommends
that laparoscopic weight loss surgery should only be performed
by surgeons who are experienced in both laparoscopic and open
bariatric procedures.
SOURCE:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Johnson & Johnson
|